RONALD REAGAN SIGNED THE KING HOLIDAY BILL, AND A BIPARTISAN CONGRESS VOTED TO OVERRIDE PRESIDENT REAGAN’S VETO OF THE COMPREHENSIVE SOUTH AFRICAN ANTI-APARTHEID ACT. I WAS THERE FOR BOTH.

Thursday October 1, 2026

The time for D.C. Statehood is now. I gave a quarter of a century of my life as a staff person for Congress, and I can tell you, the environment for passing the King Holiday Bill, after years of trying, was comparable to today's environment. President Reagan repeatedly said Martin Luther King, Jr. was a Communist, and he would not sign the Bill. But he signed it.

I was on the West Lawn of the Capitol when thousands gathered to hear Stevie Wonder sing that "Happy Birthday Song", and a little Black Boy, exhausted from marching, was captured in a photo that appeared on the Front Page of the Washington Post, upper fold, where he sat on the curb, chin in hand, with a simple sign, "Pass the Bill". 

I was there when Pug Ravenel, a Member of Congress from a distinguished Political Family in South Carolina expressed support for the South Africa Bill, notwithstanding President Reagan's position that an Executive Order would be best to handle a situation where four percent (4%) of the population owned, controlled the land and voted over ninety-six (96%) percent of Black South Africans, and a Bipartisan Congress voted to override his Veto of the Bill to correct that situation.

I want to be there when a Bipartisan Congress passes H.R. 51, the D.C. Statehood Bill. The time is now. The environment is set.


Thirty Million Americans visit Washington, D.C. each year. The condensed Booklet I am about to release will be presented in three parts, and if every D.C. resident reads and studies it, it will allow each to be able to contribute to the education of those visitors as well as friends and relatives from the states. Those visitors and your friends and relatives will then be equipped to debunk and disprove the bad information and misinformation that opponents of D.C. Statehood rely upon to deny the people of the District of Columbia the same rights that all other Americans take for granted. Read this Booklet, the first of three parts. Study this Booklet. Do so, and D.C. Statehood is within our reach, NOW!


This is a shortened version of a writing, the product of a series of writings, first begun in 1975. From the moment I settled in Washington, D.C., it struck me as strange that by virtue of the routine act of crossing an invisible line, coming within the boundaries of the nation’s capital and making it my home, most of the rights I had enjoyed, as a citizen of the state of Indiana, were lost. In the shadow of one of the greatest icons of democracy, the Washington Monument, that simple act of moving, an act carried out by thousands and likely millions over the years, has made our lives difficult and different from the lives of every other citizen in America. That simple act caused us to become second-class, non-voting citizens unable to participate fully in the federal government.
Currently, more than 700,000 taxpaying Americans who reside in the District of Columbia, more than the number of those who reside in two states, Wyoming and Vermont, and close to the number who reside in five other states, bear all the burdens of citizenship, yet do not share in the benefits, particularly, the right to vote in the same manner as all other citizens.
In 1978, the House of Representatives and the Senate passed House Joint Resolution 554 by a two-thirds vote, a Resolution that I wrote. The Resolution proposed that the District of Columbia would be treated “as though it were a state,” for the purposes of electing Senators, Representatives, the President and Vice-President and members to the Electoral College. As the principal author of that Resolution; as one who labored with many others for the seven years following passage of the proposal to secure ratification by thirty-eight states, only to fall short of our goal; as the principal staff author of the very first D.C. Statehood Bill, following the District of Columbia’s historic Statehood Constitutional Convention, House Resolution 51, introduced before Congress in 1987; and as a more than fifty-year resident of the District of Columbia, this is a subject that has claimed much of my attention and a great deal of my interest.
Over the years, I have written about this contradiction between benefits and burdens. America seeks to “extend the perimeters of democracy around the world,” as former President Ronald Reagan often stated, yet democracy comes to a screeching halt within view of the White House. I have joined many and many have joined me in these writings, far too many to mention here. This condensed version and the longer treatise, to be updated and re-published, is designed to assist readers in understanding the complex relationship between the federal government and the American citizens who happen to reside in the nation’s capital.

Throughout the muddied history of the District of Columbia, this relationship has been marked by false promises, mounting legal complications, and the unwillingness of the courts, to date, to provide the rights that our citizens deserve. This relationship, unique throughout the world, is a classic “chicken and egg” dilemma. If District residents had political standing and sovereignty, we could have senators, representatives, and local autonomy. If we had senators, representatives, and local autonomy, we could have political standing and sovereignty. The challenge, however, is how to initiate this cycle, because currently, the District of Columbia has neither chicken nor egg. As an Assistant Attorney General for the United States, former Supreme Court Chief Justice William Rehnquist, a Republican, stated, “The need for an amendment [providing representation for the District of Columbia] at this late date in our history is too self-evident for further elaboration; continued denial of voting representation from the District of Columbia can no longer be justified.” Unfortunately, the promissory note that Rehnquist once issued has never been collected. This abandoned promise of the United States still persists as the greatest stain on this country, and now is the time, more than ever before, when we should insist that this promise be fulfilled."


I shall give away, free, a limited number of this easy to study booklet, on 25 October, and will present a forum for those who wish to receive it. If our presumed next Congressman, current Council member Robert White, is available, whose energy, vision and drive on this subject is today, without comparison, he is free to speak, whenever he arrives. I learned that in my 25 years, working on the Hill.

There will be limited seating, so follow this Post, beginning October 1st, for the time and place of the Forum.


I learned in college that, "The first stage of revolution (change) is revolution of the mind".

"Freedom ain't free".

This Booklet, I believe, will help us conclude this Journey of a thousand miles.

Leave a Reply

Johnny Barnes as a new Attorney

Examples of Articles – Inside the Members’ Area

Johnny Barnes
  • Tenants and Foreclosure
  • Tenants Beware of Consent Judgments
  • Warranties and Guaranties
  • Wills and Estates
  • Rules of the Road, Parts II and III
  • Environmental Energy Law
  • Environmental Land Use Law
Become a member today!

Coming soon, a series of Articles on Car Repairs

Contact

Living With The Law
Washington, DC

Attorney Johnny Barnes
info@livingwiththelaw.com

If you have questions about the website, subscribing or submitting material, please contact us. We'll be in touch!